[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT

From: Rahul Dhesi
Subject: Re: and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:22:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: nn/6.7.0

Tim Smith <> writes:

>BusyBox, however, appears to be a US non-registered work, not a non-us
>non-registered work.

To whom does it appear this way?  Not to any of the defendants so far.

>Thus, we'd expect that even if someone were suing over a non-US work,
>they would register before filing suit, to take advantage of the extra

These extra remedies being what -- statutory damages?

Damages are probably not so important to the Busybox developers. The big
stick they carry, which became bigger after the JMRI decision, is the
threat of an injunction.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]