[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?
From: |
JEDIDIAH |
Subject: |
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:46:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2008-09-17, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> ...it also includes it's own versions of fundemental libraries.
>
> ...which still does not make the program a derivative work.
Someone just tried the same sort of thing with JK Rowling and lost.
--
Nothing today, likely nothing since we tamed fire,
is genuinely new: culture, like science and |||
technology grows by accretion, each new creator / | \
building on the works of those that came before.
Judge Alex Kozinski
US Court of Appeals
9th Circuit
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, (continued)
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Barry Margolin, 2008/09/21
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/21
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Barry Margolin, 2008/09/22
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, David Kastrup, 2008/09/22
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/22
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/17
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Barry Margolin, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, David Kastrup, 2008/09/19
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, JEDIDIAH, 2008/09/17
Message not available
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, David Kastrup, 2008/09/17