[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?

From: Barry Margolin
Subject: Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:48:08 -0400
User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)

In article <KlhAk.498$>,
 Hyman Rosen <> wrote:

> Barry Margolin wrote:
> > A new version of Linux with a different scheduler serves the same 
> > purpose: they're both operating system kernels.
> But the new scheduler is not a transformed version of any other code.
> Both are required for a work to be derivative.

It's not the scheduler that's a derivative, it's the new Linux kernel 
that results from replacing the scheduler in the old kernel.  I.e.

Linux - schedulerA + schedulerB => derivative of Linux.

Barry Margolin,
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]