Re: Now it's my compiler!

[Rjack]

Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <9KWdnfvjH6NjnkHVnZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@giganews.com>,
> Rjack  <user@example.net> wrote:
>
> > My third party compiler is none of their damn business. I can paint
> > it red, pee on it or give to charity -- it's simply none of their
> > damn business.
>
> Feel free to try shipping Microsoft's C++ compiler with your program.
>
> The statement was an observation about the restrictions you typically
> find in commercial software, not about the GPL.

Don't insert your assumptions about what compiler I have into my
argument so that you can create a strawman for a script-kiddie
put-down. How do you know I don't use the BSD licensed pcc compiler
or an Intel compiler? You don't. The point of my post was that it's
none of your damn business what name brand or version compiler I
use. I stand by that assertion.

> You just misunderstood the wording, and are trying to cover up
> your mistake with bluster.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)