[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL propaganda
From: |
JEDIDIAH |
Subject: |
Re: GPL propaganda |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:55:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2008-09-26, Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>>
>> [ more anti-GPL blather, under yet another subject heading ]
>>
>> Rjack, I notice that as soon as you lose the argument under one subject
>> heading, you restart it with a new subject heading. Do you really think
>> that by repeating the same thing, you will get a different result?
>
> What argument is that Rahul? That a copyright license is a contract?
It doesn't matter what you call it. It's the only thing that gives
you authorization to re-distribute the work.
[deletia]
--
It is not true that Microsoft doesn't innovate.
They brought us the email virus.
In my Atari days, such a notion would have |||
been considered a complete absurdity. / | \
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
- Re: GPL propaganda, (continued)
Re: GPL propaganda, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/25
Re: GPL propaganda, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/26
Re: GPL propaganda, Andrew Halliwell, 2008/09/25