[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Busybox/ 'won' in court (default judgment) --

From: Rahul Dhesi
Subject: Re: The Busybox/ 'won' in court (default judgment) -- where is the press release and all the buzz?
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: nn/6.7.0

Rjack <> writes:

>Another case to provide insight into default judgment policy:

[ case law fragment ]

As always, there is a big problem with Rjack's quote (going beyond
Rjack's laziness in providing no public link).  Court of appeals rulings
apply to specific facts. Rjack's case law fragments are almost provided
by him without trying to match them to the facts at hand. He posts his
out-of-context quotes essentially in a vacuum. This is how trolls work.
And when his trolling fizzles out, he will repost it under a different
subjet heading, hoping his duplication won't be noticed.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]