[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:54:58 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Your post, while full of words, lacks any actual semantic
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvDIEBOLD/COMPLAINT.pdf
"For non-commercial use, Artifex licences Ghostscript to the public
free of charge under the GNU GPL."
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvDIEBOLD/COMPLAINT.pdf
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvDIEBOLD/COMPLAINT.pdf
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvDIEBOLD/COMPLAINT.pdf
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/29
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/30
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/26
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Cork Soaker, 2008/11/28