gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:35:33 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> Diebold will presumably offer up a variety of defenses in its court
> papers, and things will go on from there. First of all, is Diebold
> honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone Ghostscript? 

"honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone Ghostscript" 

Suppose that Diebold doesn't honor the terms of the GPL for "standalone
Ghostscript".

What does that ("honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone
Ghostscript") have to do with the copyright law, Hyman? The GPL is not
the copyright law, don't you agree with that, Hyman? 

----
U.S. District Court
California Northern District (San Francisco)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv-04837-SC

Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al

Assigned to: Hon. Samuel Conti

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
----

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]