[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:27:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
GNU Emacs 23.0.60.11 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.11) of 2008-11-19 on Linux development 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP |
Sermo Malifer <sermomalifer@noemail.com> writes:
> amicus_curious wrote:
>>
>> "Rjack" <user@example.net> wrote in message
>> ZdWdnaUnF5_BIuDUnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com">news:ZdWdnaUnF5_BIuDUnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> THE GPL IS THE BEST FRIEND MICROSOFT EVER HAD. Open source
>>> advocates are ideologically blinded to these facts.
>>>
>> That is an interesting spin to the issue!
>>
>> The reality is that the GPL has no practical effect on anything of
>> any importance in terms of market development. One could, perhaps,
>> take GPL code and attempt to create a new software product by
>> extending the GPL source in some useful way, but, if you think about
>> it more deeply, that is ever so unlikely to be successful.
>
> Or you could create software that runs on a GPL OS but that is not
> derived from its source code.
>
>> For example, say you could safely, without getting ground up in the
>> gears of the SFLC or FSF, hijack the source code for Open Office or
>> Gimp or even Linux itself.
>
> IOW, if you could steal somebody else's work and pass it off as your own.
>
>> If you try to sell it as a product by itself, with nothing added,
>> you are going to fail, since the product is already available at
>> essentially zero cost and you have nothing to differentiate
>> yourself.
>
> IOW, you can't get away with stealing somebody else's work and passing
> it off as your own.
Not "IOW" at all.
It doesn't take much imagination to see the stuff being stolen and used
as a BASE for an improved version.
You sound as much of a dumb arse as Phil Da Lick on this subject.
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/27
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/01/27
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, chrisv, 2009/01/27
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Doug Mentohl, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Sermo Malifer, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, David Kastrup, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy,
Hadron <=
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Robert Heller, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, ZnU, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Snit, 2009/01/26
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/24
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rjack, 2009/01/24
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/25
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, David Kastrup, 2009/01/25
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rjack, 2009/01/24
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/24