Rjack wrote:
It is a verifiable fact that ever completed suit filed by the SFLC
was terminated by the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal. Just show us
the legal documents.
It is a verifiable fact that in each such case the defendants
made the GPLed sources available, as asked in the complaint
against them, when they were not doing so at some point before
the complaint was filed.
It remains the case that no one is using your (incorrect) legal
theories to openly violate the terms of the GPL. Everyone acts
as if the GPL is a valid license which means just what it says,
even people who are opposed to its principles.