Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy

[chrisv]

Hyman Rosen wrote:

>Rjack wrote:
>>
>> It is a verifiable fact that ever completed suit filed by the SFLC
>> was terminated by the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal.

Because the plaintiffs got what they wanted, the defendant's
compliance to the terms of the GPL.  Sheesh.

>It is a verifiable fact that in each such case the defendants
>made the GPLed sources available, as asked in the complaint
>against them, when they were not doing so at some point before
>the complaint was filed.
>
>It remains the case that no one is using your (incorrect) legal
>theories to openly violate the terms of the GPL. Everyone acts
>as if the GPL is a valid license which means just what it says,
>even people who are opposed to its principles.

Amazing how the anti-OSS trolls don't mind, at all, making complete
jackasses of themselves.

-- 
'A lot of OSS is simply crap. And if it were "for sale" they would
soon go out of business.'  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark