[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:46:06 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081105)

Rjack wrote:
Did you notice that I documented the legal authority to support my
legal assertion?

Did you notice that the ruling you cite asserts precisely the opposite
of what you would like?

    Held: An agreement between an employer and an employee to arbitrate
    employment-related disputes does not bar the EEOC from pursuing
    victim-specific judicial relief, such as backpay, reinstatement,
    and damages, in an ADA enforcement action.

In our analogy, the employer is the code grabber, the employee is the
code user, and the EEOC is the SFLC, stepping in to pursue victim-
specific judicial relief.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]