Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> If you think the Copyright Office may re-define the definitions
> provided by Congress in the Copyright Act then you are either
> extremely naive or smoking something causing you to hallucinate.

Given the choice of believing you or believing the manual of
procedures for the government agency responsible for copyrights,
I should think the choice is obvious. To be explicit: not you.