Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"

[Hyman Rosen]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> I personally believe that even if a particular instance of object code
> is judged to include protected expression of both/either source code's
> copyright owner and/or compiler's copyright owner, the resulting binary
> is merely an aggregation of multiple computer program works -- in
> GNUspeak it is called "mere aggregation".
>
> Do you agree, Hyman?

Yes.