|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:31:40 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: >The FSF and GPL3 tries to pull a fast one by substituting the term >"convey" for the term "distribute" as it is used in 17 USC 106(3)... Some might think it wise to use terms not specific to US law for software that will get worldwide propagation. Please explain why you seem to disagree. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |