[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:25:56 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <> writes:

Some might think it wise to use terms not specific to US law for
 software that will get worldwide propagation.  Please explain
why you seem to disagree.

Attempting to use a license for worldwide "propagation" (presumably
for one vast World Socialist Order) under disparate legal
jurisdictions is the ultimate folly ...

But this doesn't explain why you seem to think that the license
should use US-specific language.

One tactic of trolling is to endlessly ask "why" questions especially concerning other's motivations. Perhaps you should simply state your reasons "why" I shouldn't prefer US-specific language.

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]