Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Rjack]

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>
> > > Some might think it wise to use terms not specific to US law for
> > >  software that will get worldwide propagation.  Please explain
> > > why you seem to disagree.
>
> > Attempting to use a license for worldwide "propagation" (presumably
> > for one vast World Socialist Order) under disparate legal
> > jurisdictions is the ultimate folly ...
>
> But this doesn't explain why you seem to think that the license
> should use US-specific language.

One tactic of trolling is to endlessly ask "why" questions 
especially concerning other's motivations. Perhaps you should simply 
state your reasons "why" I shouldn't prefer US-specific language.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)