[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Peter Köhlmann
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:54:25 +0100
User-agent: KNode/0.99.01

Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <> wrote:
>> Section 5 of the GPL is legal nonsense.
> I think you may have mentioned this before, once or twice.
> The GPL was formulated by experienced lawyers, with good understanding
> of copyright and contract law.  Do bear in mind that the law doesn't
> always mean what it seems to to the legally inexperienced.
> It seems overwhelmingly likely that you are simply mistaken.

It is far more likely that he is either trolling in an extremely 
ineffective way. Or extremely stupid. Or both
Klingon function calls do not have 'parameters' - 
they have 'arguments' - and they ALWAYS WIN THEM.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]