[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:02:39 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
Hi, Alex!
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Take off your blinders, Alan.
> http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
> (from the complaint)
> ------
> 11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers
> the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (?Infringing Product?), which
> contains embedded executable software (?Firmware?). Defendant also
> provides the Firmware corresponding to the Infringing Product for
> download via its website, at
> http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp.
> 12. Upon information and belief, the Firmware contains BusyBox, or a
> modified version of BusyBox that is substantially similar to BusyBox, in
> object code or executable form. Distribution of the Firmware, either as
> part of the Infringing Product or by itself, thus inherently includes
> distribution of BusyBox and, as such, Defendant is required to have
> Plaintiffs? permission to make any such distribution. The only such
> permission available for BusyBox is the contingent one granted under the
> License.
> ------
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf
> Got it now, Alan?
What are you trying to say, here? Are you trying to make some sort of
point?
> regards,
> alexander.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/15
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, ZnU, 2009/02/13