[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:02:39 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386))

Hi, Alex!

In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov <> wrote:

> Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> Take off your blinders, Alan.


> (from the complaint)

> ------
> 11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers
> the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (?Infringing Product?), which
> contains embedded executable software (?Firmware?). Defendant also
> provides the Firmware corresponding to the Infringing Product for
> download via its website, at

> 12. Upon information and belief, the Firmware contains BusyBox, or a
> modified version of BusyBox that is substantially similar to BusyBox, in
> object code or executable form. Distribution of the Firmware, either as
> part of the Infringing Product or by itself, thus inherently includes
> distribution of BusyBox and, as such, Defendant is required to have
> Plaintiffs? permission to make any such distribution. The only such
> permission available for BusyBox is the contingent one granted under the
> License.
> ------


> Got it now, Alan?

What are you trying to say, here?  Are you trying to make some sort of

> regards,
> alexander.

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]