|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:25:44 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
ZnU wrote:
In article <4995CE3F.2EACF73E@web.de>, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:ZnU wrote:In article <4995AEE4.AB5BFFF5@web.de>, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:Are the owners of all the routers between you and Verizon also distributors?Hyman Rosen wrote:Alexander Terekhov wrote:Hyman Rosen wrote: [... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...] And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content just like the Actiontec itself?Because things are murky when it comes to deciding who isresponsible for making copies when a user asks for a download and a web server goes to another server to ask for the content and transmits it to the user?Nothing is murky here. The owners of both servers are doing distribution. Both are distributors.http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/512.html Verizon's distribution page (initiating/offering transmission) http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp doesn't fall under 17 USC 512. Don't you think so, ZnU?It comes pretty close. It might fail on (a)(2) because Verizon seems to be selecting the material available, but I suspect a clever lawyer could manage to spin that around until a judge thought otherwise....
The Verizon lawsuit involved no registered copyrights. The copyright infringement claims were without standing to even be heard in federal court so 17 USC 512 is *utterly irrelevant*. If SFLC and GPL supporters want to argue "victory" in a federal case let them file a complaint eligible for jurisdiction under copyright law. Then let the case proceed to trial -- something that has happened zero times. The SFLC is trying the same tired propaganda tactics used by "creation science" against evolution. Hyping the GPL with obviously frivolous lawsuits isn't winning any new converts to "Free Software". Sincerely, Rjack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |