|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: >Why would I want to try that Rahul? >Just read the prevailing law in the Second Circuit where the SFLC >filed its Busybox suits: >...Whether this requirement is jurisdictional is >not up for debate in this Circuit. On two recent occasions, we have >squarely held that it is"... Ah! A jurisdictional argument that you were treating as one of standing. This is why you should search for article III standing. It will clarify the difference between standing and jurisdiction. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |