[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:35:56 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Rjack wrote:
Why? So GNUtians can't claim preposterous settlement terms
without verification.

Why should the SFLC care what a bunch of nattering nabobs
have to say? You must have a very odd notion of how suits
are conducted.

Tell that to Verizon and they'll tell *you* as well as the SFLC to
kiss their royal purple ass. Check with Alexander as to why.

The manufacturer of the routers that Verizon provides to its
customers now makes the GPLed sources properly available. You
may wish to believe that Verizon is deliberately flouting the
GPL and the SFLC is too timid to pursue the case, but there is
no evidence of this.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]