Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> Why? So GNUtians can't claim preposterous settlement terms
> without verification.

Why should the SFLC care what a bunch of nattering nabobs
have to say? You must have a very odd notion of how suits
are conducted.

> Tell that to Verizon and they'll tell *you* as well as the SFLC to
> kiss their royal purple ass. Check with Alexander as to why.

The manufacturer of the routers that Verizon provides to its
customers now makes the GPLed sources properly available. You
may wish to believe that Verizon is deliberately flouting the
GPL and the SFLC is too timid to pursue the case, but there is
no evidence of this.