Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> Do you mean those BusyBox "copyright holders" who *cannot* go to
> federal court in the Second Circuit seeking redress because THEY
> HAVE NO REGISTERED COPYRIGHTS and therefore no standing to sue?

No judge has dismissed any of these cases yet for the copyright
holders not having standing.

> Verizon told the SFLC to kiss their Tyrian purple ass and
> the SFLC filed a voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE so that Verizon
> wouldn't kick their dumb ass all over the courtroom.

While this is what you wish is true, that does not make it true.
Meanwhile, Verizon's router supplier has a very prominent web
page which makes the sources available and prominently features
icons of the free software movement.