[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:35:16 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Rjack wrote:
Do you mean those BusyBox "copyright holders" who *cannot* go to
federal court in the Second Circuit seeking redress because THEY
HAVE NO REGISTERED COPYRIGHTS and therefore no standing to sue?

No judge has dismissed any of these cases yet for the copyright
holders not having standing.

Verizon told the SFLC to kiss their Tyrian purple ass and
the SFLC filed a voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE so that Verizon
wouldn't kick their dumb ass all over the courtroom.

While this is what you wish is true, that does not make it true.
Meanwhile, Verizon's router supplier has a very prominent web
page which makes the sources available and prominently features
icons of the free software movement.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]