Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message 
news:NUEnl.22790$uG1.14635@newsfe16.iad...
> amicus_curious wrote:
> > Note the fact that Verizon, the defendant, is not mentioned in this 
> > statement as having to do anything at all.  The SDLC surrendered, pure 
> > and simple.  They look like fools.
>
> The source code for the GPLed software on Actiontec routers
> which Verizon distributes was made available as a result of
> the legal action taken by the SFLC. They look like victors.

But it was not made available as a result of that legal action.  It was made 
available before the legal action.  The SDLC never sued the party that made 
it available either.  The SDLC sued the wrong party, certainly, both in 
terms of the law and in terms of publicity.  Now they look like boobs.