[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:36:23 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

amicus_curious wrote:

"Hyman Rosen" <> wrote in message news:NUEnl.22790$uG1.14635@newsfe16.iad...
amicus_curious wrote:
Note the fact that Verizon, the defendant, is not mentioned
in this statement as having to do anything at all.  The SDLC
surrendered, pure and simple.  They look like fools.

The source code for the GPLed software on Actiontec routers which Verizon distributes was made available as a result of the
legal action taken by the SFLC. They look like victors.

But it was not made available as a result of that legal action.
It was made available before the legal action.  The SDLC never
sued the party that made it available either.  The SDLC sued the
wrong party, certainly, both in terms of the law and in terms of
publicity.  Now they look like boobs.

Please don't insult boobs! I've seen a lot of boobs that look much
smarter than Dan Ravicher or Eben Moglen.

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]