[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: amicus_curious
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:10:20 -0500

"Rahul Dhesi" <> wrote in message news:gnnqah$gv6$
"amicus_curious" <> writes:

I don't suggest that enforcement itself is the problem, it is the
enforcement of meaningless requirements....

The CAFC has ruled that these requirements are not meaningless.
They suggested that the requirements were not meaningless to the copyright holders who get a thrill out of seeing their name in print, but that is meaningless to me. I think that it speaks ill of those egomaniacs who want to create such a ruckus just so that the world might see how smart they are. Pathetic.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]