Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message 
85ab8f68m4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85ab8f68m4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>
> > amicus_curious wrote:
> > > What irks me is that the victims of the SDLC
>
> Wait, where are the victims if the rant du jour is that the cases are
> all voluntarily dismissed with damage to the SDLC?  Really, our trolls
> should try not to claim too many contradictory things at once.
The SFLC sues someone and that causes consternation, whether the suit is 
easily settled or not.  Anyone and everyone who wants to fuss with FOSS 
knows to go to the appropriate project site and get the latest and greatest 
versions.  The companies using embedded FOSS in their products are doing 
what the FOSS authors wanted them to do.  But here comes the FSF and SFLC to 
harass them over some meaningless details.  Sure the suits are dismissed 
voluntarily after the victims are roughed up a little.  The victims are 
eager to put it all behind them.  No business wants to litigate anything 
ever.  Not so the SFLC.