[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:20:36 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:05:02 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

> I have read through it previously and I don't have any problem with the
> notion as a concept.  However, in the case of BusyBox, such hypothetical
> benefits did not accrue to the copyright holders.  There was no
> modification that changed the library for the authors' benefit or any
> user.  In the JMRI case, the district judge found the same thing to be
> true.

You're begging the question.  Your "conclusion" is that the source need 
only be available if it's been modified, and, since the source wasn't 
modified, then it need not be available.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]