[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Chris Ahlstrom |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:14:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) |
After takin' a swig o' grog, Mart van de Wege belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> "amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
>
>> Even so how likely is it that the target of this exploit is savvy
>> enough to have combed through the source and implemented his own fix
>> enable by knowing which library version of BusyBox was in use in his
>> $25 router? It would be more probable that he would win the
>> Powerball Lottery twice in a row.
>>
> You're excluding the middle. Between not knowing anything and hacking
> the firmware yourself is the possibility that knowing the exact
> version numbers of the component parts gives the owner the possibility
> to determine how vulnerable they are, and to take steps, ranging from
> taking in the router to the reseller to have it serviced, or patching
> it themselves, and everything in between.
>
> Then again, you really don't think these things through, now do you?
> Your every effort in this thread screams intellectual laziness, if not
> outright stupidity.
Unfortunately, that covers an awful lot of computer users.
--
People disagree with me. I just ignore them.
-- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Chris Ahlstrom <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/20
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/20