Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:9psol.15170$Si4.8455@newsfe22.iad...
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:44 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>
> > > The mere fact that you are distributing the software (usually the
> > > binaries, or as firmware) requires the distributor to make the source
> > > (and the very *same* source for the binaries) available. Failing to do
> > > so will put the distributor at odds with copyright law
> > No shit, Dick Tracy.  I simply say that is silly.
>
>
> And if the source isn't available then where's the attribution?  At a
> minimum, sounds like plagiarism.
Only if you don't know the meaning of the term.