[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:52:11 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:35:04 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
> "Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9psol.15170$Si4.8455@newsfe22.iad...
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:44 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>>
>>>> The mere fact that you are distributing the software (usually the
>>>> binaries, or as firmware) requires the distributor to make the source
>>>> (and the very *same* source for the binaries) available. Failing to
>>>> do so will put the distributor at odds with copyright law
>>>>
>>> No shit, Dick Tracy. I simply say that is silly.
>>
>>
>> And if the source isn't available then where's the attribution? At a
>> minimum, sounds like plagiarism.
>>
> Only if you don't know the meaning of the term.
How can not attributing source *which you downloaded*, and then choose to
distribute in binary *not*, at least ethical, require attribution?
-Thufir
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22