Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
>
> > Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> >
> > > That is something else entirely. You neglected that little
> > > tidbit that they distributed GPLed binaries. By not
> > > distributing the source, they were breaching the sole licence
> > > which allowed them to distribute the binaries in the first
> > > place
> > >
> > > And *that* is every little bit grounds to sue them
> > And *that* is 100% bullshit. You can't just make up your own 
> > copyright contract containing legal gibberish and then claim it
> > gives you legal grounds to sue someone.
>
> Idiot

I might plead to foolish, silly, mad, crazy, insane, dense,
brainless, moronic, half-witted or slow-witted. But IDIOT? NEVER!
You have deeply wounded my psyche. I am *devastated*. If I promise
never to criticize again will you drop the "idiot" label and whisper
sweet nothings in my ear?

He. He.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)