[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:48:24 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <> writes:

Unfortunately your "fallback" provision, that a failed contract
cannot supply grounds for claims of promissory estoppel, is a figment of Richard Stallman's fertile imagination...

How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?

Ummm. . . do you *really* believe that:

"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
above . . ." doesn't offer a promise of copyright permissions?

Hmmm. . .

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]