|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:29:55 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: [ still arguing promissory estoppel ] >> How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise? >"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion >of it... Permission alone is not a promise. What is the writer of the GPL promising to do or not to do? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |