Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > Ummm. . . do you *really* believe that: "2. You may modify your
> > copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus
> > forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute
> > such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above .
> > . ." doesn't offer a promise of copyright permissions?
>
> It offers a promise of copyright permissions provided the license
>  terms are obeyed. What will this putative heartbroken claimant
> say when the judge asks him why he didn't believe the clearly
> spelled out obligations held?
>
> Oh, wait, I know! He'll say he read it on Usenet!

It offers a promise of copyright permissions provided the *legal*,
enforcable license terms are obeyed. What will this putative
heartbroken plaintiff say when the judge says his license terms are
obviously unenforcable.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)