[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Peter Köhlmann |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:50:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.99.01 |
amicus_curious wrote:
>
> "David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
> 85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
>> "amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
>>
>>> "Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Gpjol.24760$uG1.4427@newsfe16.iad...
>>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:24 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But the BusyBox authors are totally willing to give their work away
>>>>> and
>>>>> have been doing so for years. The only thing that they are
>>>>> hammering their users in regard to is for not publishing the
>>>>> acknowledgement and code itself on the user's own site.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Exactly, if you choose to distribute *their* work then there are
>>>> conditions. What's wrong with that?
>>>
>>> The conditions are silly and useless, making the authors appear to be
>>> the same.
>>
>> So what? You don't seem to have much of a problem with being silly and
>> useless, certainly being much more so than the BusyBox authors.
>>
> But I am not suing companies for such trivia.
And yet you are the one gloating about how MS would tear anyone to shreds
doing similar things with MS software
> And you can only muster some
> inane slurs in response?
He was extremely polite, given your extreme dishonesty
> That is pretty lame.
The one pretty lame would be you, Bill Weisgerber, with your lame attempts
at making GPL an non-issue
--
Warning: You have moved the mouse.
Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Peter Köhlmann <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/22