Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> If someone chooses to copy and distribute GPLed code,
> they can do so legally only if they accept the GPL,
> because nothing else gives them permission to do this.
> If they accept the GPL, they must follow its dictates.
> 
> If someone copies and distributes GPLed code and does
> not make the source properly available, then they are
> in violation of copyright. 

Why do you confuse the GPL "dictates" with the copyright, Hyman?

It is like confusing an alleged breach (and enforcement) of a rental
contract between a landlord and a tenant with violation (and
enforcement) of
http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/trespassing laws.

Stop being such an idiot.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)