[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:14:03 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Peter Köhlmann <> writes:

> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > They are correct Hymen. Section 2(b) is an *illegal* contractual
>>> > term.
>>> Just for the sake of playing with you: if that were a case, the legal
>>> document would be invalid.
>> Dak, dak, dak. Are you still in Germany? Don't you know that resulting
>> from Harald Welte's "enforcement" actions in Germany, the courts ruled
>> that the GPL falls under
> Fine. You might try to present a link for that claim
> Posting a link to some courts decision which has obviously nothing to do 
> with the GPL hardly counts as "evidence" of anything. Except for the 
> suspicion that you are lying, again

Oh, in most cases he is citing actual court cases.  They just don't
support anything he says.  It is just material for head-scratching.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]