[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:11:39 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

David Kastrup wrote:

[... GPL ...]

There is no contract
Let the judges in Munich and Frankfurt know about that, dear
GNUtian dak.

(in English)

Pg 11, my dear. "Die GPL ... offer ... acceptance ... § 151

Both panels erred regarding the relevance of assumed invalidity
of the GPL 2b***, however.

(From licensed German legal professional):

Uh, you cite a comment dissenting with a court decision as

That's not particularly impressive.  Not even for your standards.

Dissenting opinions are closely scrutinized amd many times highly
regarded for their legal scholarship.

How about reverting to citing some non-connected court cases
and/or adding LOL?  It still makes you look like an idiot without
a clue, but it is funnier.

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]