Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message 
news:b3Dpl.2110$Tp5.830@newsfe13.iad...
> You would like to believe that this is because they were afraid
> of Verizon, or secretly believe that the GPL is invalid, but that
> is just your imagination. There is no evidence for this. It is
> more plausible to believe that they decided that the Verizon link
> was not a GPL violation.

I don't know that they are "afraid" of Verizon, I think that they do 
understand the meaning of "dismissed with predjudice" though and have no way 
to complain of Verizon distributing executable code for Actiontec routers 
that is not accompanied by any source code or by any reference to a GPL 
license or even any acknowledgement of same.  Stay in denial, but that is 
not a good thing to do in the long run.