[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:35:14 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:56:54 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote:

> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> <
>      (27) The mere provision of physical facilities for enabling or
>      making a communication does not in itself amount to communication
>      within the meaning of this Directive.
> Since Verizon provides a link to an "actiontec gateway" URL, it can
> easily be argues that it's Actiontec, not Verizon, who is making the
> software available. Clearly, the SFLC beleieves so, since it is
> satisfied with having Actiontec provide the GPLed sources.

 I don't think a copyrighted jpg could be distributed that way, though.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]