[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:18:56 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>I think you're confusing conditions qualifying performance of a
>contract with rescission of a contract but I can't be sure.
You can be sure. I'm not, you are.
You are ignoring the plain language of the GPL where is says "provided
that" several times, and "will automatically terminate" at least once.
If you really wanted to provide useful citations, you would find some
cases in which repeated uses of such phrases were held not to constitute
conditions qualifying performance of a contract.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/01
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/02