|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:05:23 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes: >> I think Rjack has a valid point that a court might well treat the GPL >> as a contract in such a case. >Huh? You can't be held to a contract you did not sign. Does every contract require a signature? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |