Re: Doogie, go to doctor.. [was: Re: The Court disagrees ..]

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > *your* imagined settlement agreements
>
> In my case, it is easily determined from historical web searches
>  that the various defendants were for a time distributing GPLed 
> software without meeting the GPL's requirements, and after the 
> suits ended they are now complying with the GPL.

Stop changing the subject Hyman. You win a lawsuit when the court
awards you the relief requested. THE SFLC has NEVER, NEVER requested
that GPL source code be posted *anywhere* in *any* filing in federal
court. The SFLC has tried seven times in federal court and failed
seven times to secure a favorable ruling on the relief it requested:

* Super Micro Computer, Inc.   - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* Bell Microproducts, Inc.     - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* Extreme Networks, Inc.       - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* Monsoon Multimedia, Inc.     - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* Xterasys Corporation         - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* High-Antennas, L.L.C.        - voluntary dismissal no settlement
*                                agreement

* Verizon Communications, Inc. - voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE
*                                no settlement agreement

GNUtians never lose -- they just moooooooove the goalposts.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)