[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .. |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:45:38 -0800 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <11452185.99fscqFAJx@schestowitz.com>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ Alan Mackenzie on Thursday 05 March 2009 16:35 : \____
>
> > In gnu.misc.discuss Doug Mentohl <doug_mentohl@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> >> 'Software Tree LLC claims that JBoss infringes on its database patent
> >> for "exchanging data and commands between an object oriented system and
> >> a relational system." Software Tree's partners include Microsoft, and
> >> that the suit was filed in Eastern Texas, which is known as a
> >> plaintiff's paradise for patent actions."'
> >
> > Just as an aside, wouldn't it be a smart move for high tech companies to
> > avoid doing business in Eastern Texas, so that they'd couldn't be patent
> > trolled there? If enough companies boycotted that place, they might fix
> > their legal setup.
> >
> >> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/04/1615250
>
> Would that exempt them from litigation? IANAL, so I find this suggestion
> curious.
The posters you quote are overlooking a couple of things.
1. EDT is not a "plaintiff's paradise" in terms of results. Defendants
have been doing quite well there the last couple of years.
2. It *is* a plaintiff's paradise in terms of speed. The courts there
are familiar with patent litigation (which is one of the more
complicated forms of litigation), and aren't busy with a lot of other
stuff, and so patent suits move fast. Plaintiffs generally like
that--but so do defendants, so it is also a defendant's paradise.
A lawsuit is very disruptive for both parties. Pretty much anyone, not
matter what side they are on, would rather have a suit that takes 2
years in a far away district like EDT than a suit that takes 4 years in
a nearby district.
Before EDT was the big patent case district, it was some district in the
vicinity of Virginia--I forget which one. That one became a big patent
district because the head judge, who is responsible for assigning and
scheduling cases, started giving favorable scheduling to patent cases,
and so people started picking that district. He did that because, as I
mentioned earlier, patent cases are complex. That's good for the people
of the district. A patent case means a lot of lawyers compared to an
average case, and more expert witnesses, and longer trials--which means
a lot more out of area visitors booking expensive local hotel rooms.
And not just rooms--they will book giant meeting rooms, and set up a
couple dozen work areas, complete with computers, a dedicated, expensive
internet link. The people handling witness prep will be deciding at the
last minute that they don't like the clothes a witness brought, and so
will go out to the local clothing stores, and buy the witness a couple
new, custom fitted suits. (I came out of the trial where I was a
witness with four new suits and a dozen ties). I could go on, but
suffice it to say that a patent trial can bring quite a nice boost to
the local economy.
EDT became a big patent case district because of judge Ward. I believe
one of the last cases he was involved with before becoming a judge was a
patent case, although he was not a patent attorney. He enjoyed the
complexity of the case, and so when he became a judge, he sought out
patent cases. That attracted more patent cases, and so the other judges
in the district got experience with them. There isn't much federal
crime in EDT compared to many other districts, which also helps.
(Federal criminal cases take scheduling priority, because of the
Constitutional right to a speedy trial for accused criminals. In some
districts, such as ones where a lot of drug cases arise, it is very hard
to get any civil case on the calendar).
Lately, though, some companies that have filed in EDT before (Acacia,
for one) have been filing elsewhere, so there are signs another district
might be becoming the next patent hot spot.
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., (continued)
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Ezekiel, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., RonB, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Doctor Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., amicus_curious, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., AES, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Tim Smith, 2009/03/07