[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:00:58 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:21:14 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>> You have it backwards. When *sun* licenses software, IBM likes apache/
>> BSD type licenses. When *IBM* licenses software, ie gnu/linux, IBM
>> likes the gpl.
>
> You Freetards never learn. For Christ's sake, IBM was the World's first
> viscous computer monopolist.
Well, asshole's like you never see the obvious: of course it would've
been in IBM's interests to have never released any source code at all.
-Thufir
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Terry Porter, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, chrisv, 2009/03/19
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19