Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL

[Hyman Rosen]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Subsuming other non-GPL works (licensed without permission to sublicense
> under the GPL) and pretending that "a whole" is under the GPL is utter
> legal nonsense.

Fortunately, such permission is given:
    <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>
    2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions
    of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
    worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
    copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
    publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
    Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.