[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Peter Köhlmann |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:41:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.99.01 |
Rjack wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
>> Apache and the FSF both agree that the licenses are compatible,
>> and you (apparently) do not. You are, as usual, wrong.
>
> The GPL is not compatible with *anything* since it's legally
> unenforceable under US law.
Fine, fine
Now tell us something even mildly interesting, will you?
--
Subtlety is the art of saying what you think and getting out of the way
before it is understood.
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Peter Köhlmann <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/20