|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:12:30 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:The Apache License says that any distribution of such "combined" work must include a copy the Apache License because it (the Apache License, not the GPL) governs employed preexisting material licensed under the Apache License.Combined works that include GPLed code must be licensed as a whole under the GPL, and then also under the conditions imposed by the non-GPLed components.
Says who? You?
If all the conditions can be simultaneously satisfied, then the combined work may be copied and distributed, otherwise it may not.Don't you know that the ASF doesn't agree with the FSF regarding purported "incompatibility" to the GPLv2?So what?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |