[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:11:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
"amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
> "Chris Ahlstrom" <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> wrote in message
> news:9q5xl.18551$v8.5396@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> "Monopoly raises two classes of problems for a free society. First, the
>>> existence of monopoly means a limitation on voluntary exchange through a
>>> reduction in the alternatives available to individuals. Second, the
>>> existence
>>> of monopoly raises the issue of ?social responsibility?, as it has
>>> come to be
>>> called, of the monopolist."
>>> --Milton Friedman
>>
>> Heh, if Microsoft had their way, American currency would be replaced by
>> Microsoft scrip.
>>
>> Or feces as specie ;->
>>
> It must be truly embarassing to be Roy's off-magpie! A Kent wannabe?
>
Arestrom gives me the creeps. He sucks up like nobodies business. It's
embarrassing for all concerned.
--
- Red Hat on patent FUD, Doug Mentohl, 2009/03/17
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Doctor Smith, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/21