[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Red Hat on patent FUD

From: Roy Schestowitz
Subject: Re: Red Hat on patent FUD
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:28:40 +0000
User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Hash: SHA1

____/ RonB on Saturday 21 March 2009 19:05 : \____

> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:38:19 -0500, Roy Schestowitz
> <> wrote:
>> Hash: SHA1
>> ____/ Doug Mentohl on Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:49 : \____
>>> 'the purpose of this portfolio is defensive .. because of the threats of
>>> companies that are hostile to FOSS and that have amassed large
>>> stockpiles of overbroad patents'
>>> 'Although there have been some recent questions about one of our patent
>>> applications relating to the AMQP specification, they appear to
>>> originate in an attempt to spread FUD. There’s no reasonable, objective
>>> basis for controversy'
>> It's not really FUD.
>> The former head of the FFII is sure to publicise information which
>> suggests that Red Hat is not or was not serious about ending software
>> patents. People should not let them off the hook so easily.
> So... are you against any commercial sales of Linux?

No, see the following for details:

I too defended Red Hat on this until I discovered the other side of the story.

> Red Hat has stated 
> (over and over) that their patents are for defensive purposes. The company
> depends on open source development to survive. Do you think that, at some
> point, they'll say "Okay, we can take it from here, no more open
> development... it's all ours now" Have they done ANYTHING to indicate that
> this is the direction they will be going in the future?
> Some people seem to be willing to cut off their noses to spite their face.
> I just don't get it.

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Download Othello:  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem:   2075800k total,  1660792k used,   415008k free,    12460k buffers - next generation of search paradigms
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]